Eucalyptus Removal

Point Reyes National Seashore, CA
National Park Service
Submitted by Alison Forrestel, Fire Ecologist, Point Reyes National Seashore
    
  
Project ID: 1001

1. Name - Point Reyes Eucalyptus Removal

Context | Objectives | Treatment Specifics | Utilization | Targets | Pre Treatment Data | Post  Treatment Data | Links

 
 

Point Reyes National Seashore (PRNS) staff have been carrying out thinning in eucalyptus forests along the Highway One corridor and the Palomarin trailhead intermittently since February of 2005. The Seashore Fire Management Plan (FMP) called for continued reduction of the acreage of non-native evergreen forests within the Seashore for purposes of fuel reduction, fire hazard abatement, and habitat restoration. To date, approximately 35 acres have been thinned.

The thinning prescription was to remove nearly all accessible trees under 18 inches DBH, which made up the majority of stems. Trees roughly between 24 and 18 inches DBH that were readily accessible from the primary trails were also to be removed. Where feasible, native species, including Douglas-fir, coast live oak, and California bay, were protected and retained during thinning and dragging.

  
 
 

Photopoint before and after treatment

The project was conducted by the PRNS fuels crew using chainsaws and hand tools to cut the wood and a chipper to chip and spread wood on site. In some areas, the crew used chains or winches to haul sections of trunk upslope. Stumps were immediately treated with the herbicide glyphosate as soon as the trees were cut in order to prevent resprouting. The herbicide was applied directly to the cut stump by staff with the necessary training and qualifications.

The forest understory was primarily non-native invasive plants. The thinning operation chipped and broadcast much of the downed eucalyptus wood onsite to bury extensive areas infested with cape ivy, English ivy, velvet grass, French broom, pittosporum, etc. Some wood was cut and stacked for use as firewood by local residents.

Wood from a subsection of the project (1 to 2 acres; approximately 60 tons) was removed and used for cogeneration by the contractor Wheelabrator Technologies. The Seashore paid Wheelabrator approximately $20,000 to haul this material.


Figure 3. Change in Size Class Distribution

Monitoring has been conducted within this treatment site to quantify changes in biomass, fuel loading and non-native species cover. These changes are quantified in Figures 1 through 3.


Figure 1. Change in Basal Area


Figure 2. Change in Fuel Loading

Links

 

 

 2Land Ownership
National Park Service
Point Reyes National Seashore

 
 3Location
Marin County, California

 
4Forest Type
Coastal vegetation

 
 Context
 5Is this project a part of a landscape plan?
Yes

 
 6In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)?
Yes

 
 7Acreage treated
35 ac

 
 8Type of contract
Work carried out by Point Reyes NS hazard fuels crew.

 
 9Funding source
National Fire Plan

 
 10Collaborators and partners
Not applicable

 
 11Project start date
Feb 2005

 
12Project completion date (or estimated date)
Ongoing

 
 Treatment Goals
 13Restoration, watershed, or habitat improvement
Remove non-native blue gum eucalyptus

 
 14Reduce fuel load
Reduce fuel loading along the Highway One corridor

 
 15

 
 16

 
17

 
 Treatment Specifics
 18Primary treatment objective
Reduce fuel loading along the Highway One corridor
 
 19How does biomass removal fit with other objectives?
Fuel reduction goals are consistent with resource management objectives to remove non-native species
 
 20Treatment description
Remove all eucalyptus under 18 DBH
 
 21Description of contractors
Not Applicable
 
 22Travel distance for contractors
Not Applicable
 
 23Type of equipment used
Chainsaws, chippers, bobcat, dump trucks
 
 24Treatment of residual slash if any
Chipped on site
 
 25Treatment cost per acre
$600-$700
 
26Trucking costs
About $330/ton
 
 Utilization
 27Products from project
Chips for cogeneration
 
 28Price for products 
Not Applicable
 
 29Date of Sale

 
 30Did biomass markets exist previous to project?
Yes
 
 31Type of utilization
Fuel for cogeneration
 
 32How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options?
Well
 
33Distance to utilization
215 miles
 
 Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations
 34Diameter limit
24"
 
 35Basal area reduction

 
 36Crown coverage

 
 37Fuel loading

 
 38Retention guidelines

 
 39Treatment of snags and downed logs

 
 40Soil impacts

 
41Other ecological impacts monitored

 
 Pre Treatment
 42Fuel load
35 tons/acre
 
 43Stem density (stems/ac)
1600
 
 44Basal area (ft2/ac)
134
 
 45Canopy closure (%)

 
 46Height to live crown base

 
 47Snags and downed woody material

 
 48Size class distribution
See narrative
 
 49Tree species composition
95% eucalyptus; <5% Douglas-fir, coast live oak, CA bay
 
 50Presence/absence of invasive species
Eucalyptus is non-native
 
51Soil and other ecological data

 
 Post Treatment
 52Fuel load
24 tons/acre
 
 53Stem density (stems/ac)
256
 
 54Basal area (ft2/ac)
22.6
 
 55Canopy closure (%)

 
 56Height to live crown base

 
 57Snags and downed woody material

 
 58Size class distribution
See narrative
 
 59Tree species composition
21% eucalyptus; 16% Douglas-fir; 53% coast live oak; 10% CA bay
 
 60Presence/absence of invasive species
100% decrease
 
 61Soil and other ecological data

 

 
PDFPrintE-mail
 
Next >