Forest Savers LLC

Forest Stand Improvement on Private Land
Vermont
Submitted by Gerry Hawkes, Forest Savers LLC
    
  
Project ID: 1006

1. Name - Forest Savers LLC

Context | Objectives | Treatment Specifics | Utilization | Targets | Pre Treatment Data | Post Treatment Data | Links

 
 

A case study from private land in the northern hardwood forests of the Northeast emphasizes the driving force of the economy in forest management decisions. A private consulting forester was initially contracted to thin in a wildland-urban interface (WUI), but because of the economic downturn of early 2008 the job was postponed until better times.

As with many of the contractor's jobs, the landowners planned to pay to have overcrowded, dying, and hazard trees removed to improve the attractiveness and health of the woodland near their home. All biomass was to be trucked out as round wood, with salvage value of the biomass credited back to the landowners.

The biomass removal was to occur in a common Eastern stand type: a mix of white pine and hemlock in the stem exclusion stage. The job included cutting about 700 trees on approximately 3 acres and removing all material longer than 8 feet and larger than 5 inches in diameter. The contractor planned to use a tractor fitted with a Farmi winch and short log forks on the tractor's loader. The contractor would have felled and limbed in the woods with chainsaws then skidded in lengths 8 to 21 feet up to the driveway and then down the driveway to a small landing area. The 31 horsepower tractor and winch could handle up to four chokers and would skid and average of about one-quarter cord (1,200 to 1,500 pounds) per hitch on this job. If there were a longer skid or if the driveway was not frozen, the contractor planned to use the bi-directional log hauler behind the tractor and winch to boost the volume per trip to 1 to 1.5 cords (4800 to 9000 pounds) and get the wood up on wheels so it would not drag.

The contractor planned to deliver the biomass to Hemphill Power and Light in West Springfield, New Hampshire, at a price of $18 per ton as round wood in 8 to 21 foot lengths. Hemphill Power and Light, which has a 16 MW capacity, chips the round wood and burns the chips to generate electricity. Trucking one way is about 40 miles (an hour travel time). The truck used would have been a straight tri-axle with a loader behind the cab. Full loads would have weighed 15 to 16 tons each. Charge for trucking would have been approximately $270 per trip, so ability to sell the biomass would have balanced the trucking costs.

The contractor, Forest Savers LLC, would have used a unique brush mulcher to shred all the smaller underbrush, tops, and slash. The system is designed to efficiently and safely cut and shred brush and small trees in the wildland-urban interface for woodland beautification and wildfire hazard reduction. A video of the brush mulching system is available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JjhSLMxj1k

Links


 

 2Land Ownership
Private

 
 3Location
Vermont

 
4Forest Type
Northern hardwood

 
 Context
 5Is this project a part of a landscape plan?
No

 
 6In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)?
Yes

 
 7Acreage treated
3 ac

 
 8Type of contract
Timber sale

 
 9Funding source
Landowner

 
 10Collaborators and partners

 
 11Project start date
Fall 2007

 
12Project completion date
Postponed

 
 Treatment Goals
 13Restoration, watershed, or habitat improvement

 
 14Reduce fuel load

 
 15

 
 16Salvage

 
17Forest Stand Improvement

 
 Treatment Specifics
 18Primary treatment objective
Forest health
 
 19How does biomass removal fit with other objectives?
Helps fund treatment
 
 20Treatment description
Low thinning

 
 21Description of contractors

 
 22Travel distance for contractors

 
 23Type of equipment used
Hand fall; skidded with a small tractor
 
 24Treatment of residual slash if any
Mulched
 
 25Treatment cost per acre

 
26Trucking costs
$270 per trip
 
 Utilization
 27Products from project
Clean chips
 
 28Price for products 
$18/ton delivered
 
 29Date of Sale

 
 30Did biomass markets exist previous to project?
Yes
 
 31Type of utilization
Hemphill Power and Light in West Springfield 16 MW
 
 32How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options?

 
33Distance to utilization
~40 miles
 
 Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations
 34Diameter limit
None
 
 35Basal area reduction
About 30%
 
 36Crown coverage

 
 37Fuel loading

 
 38Retention guidelines

 
 39Treatment of snags and downed logs

 
 40Soil impacts

 
41Other ecological impacts monitored

 
 Pre Treatment
 42Fuel load

 
 43Stem density (stems/ac)

 
 44Basal area (ft2/ac)

 
 45Canopy closure (%)

 
 46Height to live crown base

 
 47Snags and downed woody material

 
 48Size class distribution

 
 49Tree species composition

 
 50Presence/absence of invasive species

 
51Soil and other ecological data

 
 Post Treatment
 52Fuel load

 
 53Stem density (stems/ac)

 
 54Basal area (ft2/ac)

 
 55Canopy closure (%)

 
 56Height to live crown base

 
 57Snags and downed woody material

 
 58Size class distribution

 
 59Tree species composition

 
 60Presence/absence of invasive species

 
 61Soil and other ecological data

 

 
PDFPrintE-mail
 
< Prev   Next >