Building Markets for Western Juniper

Lakeview, OR
Bureau of Land Management, Klamath Falls Resource Area
Submitted by Mike Bechdolt, District Forester, Bureau of Land Management, Lakeview District
  
Project ID: 1008

1. Name - Building Markets for Western Juniper

Context | Objectives | Treatment Specifics | Utilization | Targets | Pre Treatment data | Post Treatment data | Links

 
 

This is the first of three projects profiled on this website from the Gerber Stew Stewardship Contract on the BLM's Lakeview District. This project provides an example of how a local contractor has worked with a local secondary products facility, Collins Products, as well as with the BLM, to test and then build a market for western juniper clean chips. In lieu of burning thousands of acres, the BLM has been working with the stewardship contractor to remove cut and piled juniper and supply the local hardboard plant with clean chips.

The main goals of the project were forest and rangeland health and restoration; watershed improvement, wildlife habitat improvement, employment opportunities, and product development. Although rangeland restoration was the primary goal for cutting and piling the juniper, fuel loads were reduced by utilizing the juniper in lieu of burning it. Over the four years since initiation of the contract, approximately 1,400 acres have been implemented and another 500 acres are scheduled for treatment.

Many of the treatment areas had already been cut, piled, and were scheduled for burning. The BLM has been using the stewardship contract as a tool and opportunity to utilize, or in a sense "salvage", the material in lieu of burning it. The stewardship contractor has played a large role in finding a market for the material.

In the ponderosa pine/juniper woodlands, the primary objective is to improve resiliency of ponderosa pine forests and native shrub/forb habitat by reducing encroaching western juniper. Western juniper has encroached on millions of acres of rangeland in eastern Oregon and northern California as a result of fire suppression as well as other past management treatments. Well-established juniper stands are impacting the function, structure, and composition of native vegetation. The primary treatment is to cut and burn the material, or yard it to a loading point. Generally, all old-growth western juniper are reserved, and there is diameter limit of 24 inch DBH.



To assess utilization feasibility in lieu of burning, an analysis considered site variables, including access, ecological rangeland condition, slope, soils, and juniper density, along with other parameters. If the site is determined feasible for yarding, the material is yarded to a loading point, chipped, and hauled away in clean chip form to the local secondary manufacturing facility. Treatment to date has resulted in some timber stand improvement in areas where the juniper is removed from commercial ponderosa pine stands. In addition, there is a hope that the treatment will result in rangeland restoration improvement by reducing the competition with desirable grasses, shrubs, and forbs. Improving native habitat also brings wildlife and hydrologic benefits.

The ground-base yarding of the western juniper does result in some soil and vegetation disturbance. Monitoring is being done to determine the short and long term results of removing (yarding) the juniper in lieu of burning it. The project is designed to keep soil impacts, skid trails, and landing down to less than 20% of the area. Disturbance of native rangeland vegetation and increase of noxious weeds (cheat grass, medussa head, rubber bitterbrush) are being monitored closely and represent potential ecological constraints on increased utilization. Since the initiation of the contract, the Stewardship Contractor and the BLM have experimented with alternative methods of yarding the juniper to reduce impacts. Different yarding methods include; rubber-tired grapple skidders using one-end suspension, rubber-tired grapple skidders using full-suspension, and rubber-tired forwarders. Although full-suspension does result in less impact, yarding costs are higher.


One end suspension
 
full suspension

Forwarding experiement

The stewardship contractor was able to find a market for "clean" western juniper chips. In place of burning, the material was chipped into clean western juniper chips and sent to a local secondary products mill that manufactures hardboard products including exterior siding and trim. The material ultimately ended up in wood products where the carbon was stored instead of being released as CO2.

A limited number of contractors are willing to utilize western juniper because of the difficulty in cutting, yarding, delimbing, and grinding it. In addition to the fact that juniper does not produce large yields, ground conditions at the site of removal can be rocky. Equipment costs are generally high for a low-value product. Hence, some of the operations must be subsidized, which was stated by a number of the contractors at the pre-proposal solicitation meetings.

Cutting costs are normally paid out of fire funding and range from $118 to $190 per acre. If the site is determined feasible for yarding, costs are paid out of fire or forestry accounts. Yarding costs range from $80 to $1110 per acre. Delimbing, chipping, and hauling costs are covered by the contractor. Whatever material is not utilized is burned. Burning costs generally range from $15 to $35 per acre. Hauling costs are $2.00 per mile. The BLM's minimal price for clean chips of western juniper is $0.25 per ton. For juniper sawlogs it is $0.10 per ton. The pond value of western juniper at the present time does not cover the cutting, yarding, delimbing, chipping, and hauling costs. Hence, the government subsidizes at least the cutting and yarding of the material to a loading point. The stewardship contractor is responsible for covering the delimbing, chipping, and hauling costs.

In the surrounding area, including northern California, western juniper historically had been used primarily for firewood or hog fuel at some biomass plants. In the past 6 to 7 years, there has been a small but rapidly expanding market for juniper sawlogs where a variety of manufactured products were marketed. Only in the last 3 or 4 years has there been a sustainable demand for clean juniper chips. Western juniper under the Gerber Stew Stewardship Contract is primarily utilized as a clean chip. The woody biomass that is being generated, i.e. clean chips, meets the utilization requirements because a product is manufactured from the material.

   

Links
 

 2Land Ownership
Bureau of Land Management

 
 3Location
Lakeview, Oregon

 
4Forest Type
Ponderosa Pine; Juniper Woodlands

 
 Context
 5Is this project a part of a landscape plan?
Yes

 
 6In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)?
Partially

 
 7Acreage treated
1400 ac. Another 500 acres tasked out

 
 8Type of contract
Stewardship contract

 
 9Funding source
Multiple:  Fuels, Forestry, Fire

 
 10Collaborators and partners
Stewardship Contractor / Local Secondary Products Mill that manufactures hardboard and particle board.

 
 11Project start date
Sep. 2004

 
12Project completion date
Sep. 2014

 
 Treatment Goals
 13Restoration, watershed, or habitat improvement

 
 14Reduce fuel load

 
 15

 
 16

 
17

 
 Treatment Specifics
 18Primary treatment objective
Forest restoration
 
 19How does biomass removal fit with other objectives?
Good use of residual material
 
 20Treatment description
Remove encroaching western juniper

 
 21Description of contractors
There are limited contractors willing to utilize western juniper because of the difficulty in cutting, yarding, delimbing, and grinding it.
 
 22Travel distance for contractors
Present one-way distances range from 50 to 150 miles.
 
 23Type of equipment used
TIMCO's mechanized harvesters,large 566 John Deer skidders, delimbers, large grinder and/or chippers depending upon product, and chip vans.
 
 24Treatment of residual slash if any
On sites where utilization is determine infeasible, the cut juniper is piled and burned.
 
 25Treatment cost per acre
Cutting costs range from $118 - $190/acre. Yarding costs range from $80-$1110/acre. Burning costs generally range from $15 to $35/acre.
 
26Trucking costs
Hauling costs:  $2.00/mile
 
 Utilization
 27Products from project
TBA
 
 28Price for products 
 The BLM's minimal price for clean chips of western juniper is $0.25/ton.  For juniper sawlogs it is $0.10/ton.
 
 29Date of Sale
Under the stewardship contract, the BLM price is negotiated annually.
 
 30Did biomass markets exist previous to project?
Yes
 
 31Type of utilization
Western juniper under the Gerber Stew Stewardship Contract is primarily utilized as a clean chip.
 
 32How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options?
The clean chips meet the meet requirements manufacturing a product from the material.
 
33Distance to utilization
50 - 150 miles
 
 Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations
 34Diameter limit
Diameter limit is 24" DBH  and generally, all old growth western juniper are reserved.
 
 35Basal area reduction
Reduction of 50-200+ trees/acre to 5-10 trees per acre of western juniper
 
 36Crown coverage
Reduction from about 30%-90% to less than 5%-10%.
 
 37Fuel loading
Reduce 10-20 tons/acre of smoke emissions.
 
 38Retention guidelines
Reserve all old growth western juniper and all trees > 24" DBH.
 
 39Treatment of snags and downed logs
No retention guidelines for down western juniper.
 
 40Soil impacts
Project design is to keep soil impacts, skid trails, and landing down to less than 20% of the area.
 
41Other ecological impacts monitored
Disturbance to native rangeland vegetation and increase of noxious weeds (cheat grass) is being monitored closely.
 
 Pre Treatment
 42Fuel load
10 to 20+ green tons/acre
 
 43Stem density (stems/ac)
10 to 300+ stems/acre
 
 44Basal area (ft2/ac)

 
 45Canopy closure (%)
10% to 90+%
 
 46Height to live crown base

 
 47Snags and downed woody material
Not applicable
 
 48Size class distribution
1" - 30"+ DBH
 
 49Tree species composition
Primarily western juniper
 
 50Presence/absence of invasive species
Cheat Grass, Medussa Head, Rubber Bitterbrush
 
51Soil and other ecological data

 
 Post Treatment
 52Fuel load
Objective is to burn or utilize all - result <1-3tons/acre
 
 53Stem density (stems/ac)
Objective <10 stems/acre
 
 54Basal area (ft2/ac)
Objective < 10 sq ft / acre
 
 55Canopy closure (%)
Objective <10% / acre
 
 56Height to live crown base

 
 57Snags and downed woody material
Not applicable
 
 58Size class distribution
Old growth primarily > 24" DBH
 
 59Tree species composition
Western juniper
 
 60Presence/absence of invasive species
Cheat Grass, Medussa Head, Rubber Bitterbrush
 
 61Soil and other ecological data
Objective:  < 20% disturbance.
 

 
PDFPrintE-mail
 
< Prev   Next >