| | 2 | Land Ownership Bureau of Land Management
| |
| | 3 | Location Lakeview, Oregon
| |
| 4 | Forest Type Mixed Conifer
| |
| | Context |  |
| | 5 | Is this project a part of a landscape plan? Yes
| |
| | 6 | In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)? Partially
| |
| | 7 | Acreage treated 600 ac. Another 1,500 ac tasked out
| |
| | 8 | Type of contract Stewardship contract
| |
| | 9 | Funding source Multiple: Fuels, Forestry, Fire
| |
| | 10 | Collaborators and partners Stewardship Contractor / Local Secondary Products Mill that manufactures hardboard and particle board.
| |
| | 11 | Project start date Sep. 2004
| |
| 12 | Project completion date Sep. 2014
| |
| | Treatment Goals |  |
| | 13 | Restoration, watershed, or habitat improvement
| |
| | 14 | Reduce fuel load
| |
| | 15 |
| |
| | 16 |
| |
| 17 | Forest Stand Improvement
| |
| | Treatment Specifics |  |
| | 18 | Primary treatment objective Forest health
| |
| | 19 | How does biomass removal fit with other objectives? Biomass utilization was a better alternative to mulching on site | |
| | 20 | Treatment description Remove small diameter trees
| |
| | 21 | Description of contractors Contractor had the equipment to mechanically cut and yard the material. | |
| | 22 | Travel distance for contractors Less than 50 miles
| |
| | 23 | Type of equipment used Timbco's mechanized harvesters,large 566 John Deer skidders, delimbers, large grinder and/or chippers depending upon product, and chip vans.
| |
| | 24 | Treatment of residual slash if any Very little residual slash remained after the chipping operations.
| |
| | 25 | Treatment cost per acre Cutting costs $265/ac. Yarding costs:$80/ac. Slash busting costs would have been: $266/ac. | |
| 26 | Trucking costs Hauling costs: $2.00/mile
| |
| | Utilization |  |
| | 27 | Products from project Clean chip used in multiple hardboard products locally. | |
| | 28 | Price for products The BLM received $8.00/ton for the chip material.
| |
| | 29 | Date of Sale Project was tasked in 2004. Cut in 2005. Yarded and chipped in 2006.
| |
| | 30 | Did biomass markets exist previous to project? Yes
| |
| | 31 | Type of utilization Material was utilized as a clean chip.
| |
| | 32 | How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options? The clean chips meet the meet requirements manufacturing a product from the material.
| |
| 33 | Distance to utilization
| |
| | Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations |  |
| | 34 | Diameter limit None | |
| | 35 | Basal area reduction Basal area reduced from 81 to 56 ft2/ac | |
| | 36 | Crown coverage Reduction from about 50%-80& to 30%-50%.
| |
| | 37 | Fuel loading Not much change in fuel loading as cut material was removed.
| |
| | 38 | Retention guidelines Reserve 70+ trees per acre of desired species, vigor, and size.
| |
| | 39 | Treatment of snags and downed logs Not applicable | |
| | 40 | Soil impacts Project design is to keep soil impacts, skid trails, and landing down to less than 20% of the area.
| |
| 41 | Other ecological impacts monitored
| |
| | Pre Treatment |  |
| | 42 | Fuel load | |
| | 43 | Stem density (stems/ac) 123 trees/acre > 7" DBH & 25 - 50 Trees/Acre < 7"DBH
| |
| | 44 | Basal area (ft2/ac) 81 square ft/acre > 7" DBH & 10+sq ft/acre < 7" DBH & Relative Density Approximately 24 | |
| | 45 | Canopy closure (%) 40%-80+ % | |
| | 46 | Height to live crown base Not Measured
| |
| | 47 | Snags and downed woody material Not applicable - Plantation
| |
| | 48 | Size class distribution 1" - 14" DBH
| |
| | 49 | Tree species composition 70% PP / 25% DF/ 3% IC/ 2% WF
| |
| | 50 | Presence/absence of invasive species None noted | |
| 51 | Soil and other ecological data | |
| | Post Treatment |  |
| | 52 | Fuel load
| |
| | 53 | Stem density (stems/ac) 78 Trees/Acre > 7 " DBH | |
| | 54 | Basal area (ft2/ac) 56 square feet/acre > 7" DBH & Relative Density Approximately 17 | |
| | 55 | Canopy closure (%) 30% - 60%
| |
| | 56 | Height to live crown base Not Measured | |
| | 57 | Snags and downed woody material Not applicable - Plantation | |
| | 58 | Size class distribution 90% of the Trees 1"-16" DBH
| |
| | 59 | Tree species composition 70% PP / 25% DF/ 3% IC/ 2% WF
| |
| | 60 | Presence/absence of invasive species None noted
| |
| | 61 | Soil and other ecological data Objective: < 20% disturbance.
| |