| | In the third project from the Klamath Falls Resource Area, "Utilization of Residual Timber Sale Landings", the BLM is using the stewardship contract to utilize old timber sale landing piles instead of burning them. This case study is an example of how a stewardship contract can be used in a flexible manner to address issues beyond standard harvests. The project focuses on residual landings from 3,000 to 4,000 acres of commercial timber sales. The timber sale purchaser is not required to remove the landing debris, hence the BLM is taking care of the issue through the stewardship contractor at a subsidized rate. Material has been removed from approximately 50 to 100 landings so far, and more than 100 more landings have been tasked out. Two task orders have been issued: the first one in 2006 for 8,000 tons, and the second in 2007 for 10,000 tons.
The material is from mixed conifer and ponderosa pine stands. Residual timber sale landing material includes tops, culls, and submerchantable material that was cut and yarded concurrently with the cutting and yarding of commercial sawlogs. Under the timber sale, whole tree yarding is required, so thousands of tops were brought to the landing that did not meet commercial sawlog specifications. Approximately 1 to 4 tons of biomass in the form of non-sawlog material were generated from each acre of timber sale. Whole tree yarding is required to reduce the risk of adding fuels to the timber stand. By biomassing the landing piles, overall fuel loading is reduced, as are smoke emissions.
Instead of burning residual landing material, it is utilized as either clean chips or hog fuel. The BLM is encouraged to reduce smoke emissions when and where feasible. In some areas, other agencies do not have to subsidize the removal of such material, but are auctioning residual landing piles and getting $0.20 per CCF. In this case, the BLM receives $0.10 per ton for the material. Contractors must have grinding equipment to grind the slash into certain sizes acceptable to the biomass plants. There are six biomass plants within a 250-mile radius. The furthest distance hauled to date has been to a plant in Anderson, California—about 250 miles. The biomass was carried as a "back haul" by a company transporting clean chip to Klamath Falls. The back haul allowed the vans to return with a transportable product instead of going back empty. The government subsidy rate varies from $15 to $23 per ton, depending upon haul distance and market. Hauling costs are approximately $2 per mile. There has been a market for biomass in the surrounding area since late 1980, when northern California constructed a number of biomass plants. A large biomass plant exists in Medford as well. The Klamath Falls Resource Area has been promoting biomass utilization since 1993, when it started requiring submerchantable thinning concurrent with commercial timber sale operations. It also required residual landing material to be hauled away as biomass for utilization. Links
| | | | 2 | Land Ownership Bureau of Land Management
| | | | 3 | Location Lakeview, Oregon
| | | 4 | Forest Type Mixed Conifer; Ponderosa Pine
| | | | Context |  | | | 5 | Is this project a part of a landscape plan? Yes
| | | | 6 | In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)? Partially
| | | | 7 | Acreage treated Landings from 3,000 to 4,000 ac of timber harvest
| | | | 8 | Type of contract Stewardship contract
| | | | 9 | Funding source Primarily fuel funding
| | | | 10 | Collaborators and partners Stewardship Contractor / 3 Surrounding Biomass Facilities
| | | | 11 | Project start date Sep. 2004
| | | 12 | Project completion date Sep. 2014
| | | | Treatment Goals |  | | | 13 | Restoration, watershed, or habitat improvement
| | | | 14 | Reduce fuel load
| | | | 15 |
| | | | 16 |
| | | 17 | Forest Stand Improvement
| | | | Treatment Specifics |  | | | 18 | Primary treatment objective Biomass removal
| | | | 19 | How does biomass removal fit with other objectives? Main objective | | | | 20 | Treatment description Remove material from landing
| | | | 21 | Description of contractors Contractors must have grinding equipment in order to grind the slash up into a certain piece size acceptable to the biomass plants. | | | | 22 | Travel distance for contractors Within a 250 mile radius, there are 6 biomass plants.
| | | | 23 | Type of equipment used Grinders, Chip Vans, Front End Loaders
| | | | 24 | Treatment of residual slash if any All landing slash is utilized for biomass.
| | | | 25 | Treatment cost per acre Government subsidy rate varies from $15 to $23/Ton depending upon haul distance and market. | | | 26 | Trucking costs Hauling costs: $2.00/mile
| | | | Utilization |  | | | 27 | Products from project Hog fuel for biomass energy plants | | | | 28 | Price for products The BLM pays $15 - $23/ton depending upon haul distance, market, and other factors. The BLM receives $0.10/ton for the material.
| | | | 29 | Date of Sale Two task orders have been issued: one in 2006 for 8,000 tons, another in 2007 for 10,000 tons.
| | | | 30 | Did biomass markets exist previous to project? Yes
| | | | 31 | Type of utilization Material is being utilized as hog fuel to fuel biomass plants.
| | | | 32 | How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options? The woody biomass being generated can be utilized by the surrounding biomass facilities.
| | | 33 | Distance to utilization 70-250 miles
| | | | Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations |  | | | 34 | Diameter limit
| | | | 35 | Basal area reduction
| | | | 36 | Crown coverage
| | | | 37 | Fuel loading Project reduced fuel load on landings.
| | | | 38 | Retention guidelines Not applicable - Standard retention guidelines for timber sales is 80-120 ft2/ac
| | | | 39 | Treatment of snags and downed logs
| | | | 40 | Soil impacts
| | | 41 | Other ecological impacts monitored Reduced smoke emissions from biomass operations
| | | | Pre Treatment |  | | | 42 | Fuel load | | | | 43 | Stem density (stems/ac)
| | | | 44 | Basal area (ft2/ac) | | | | 45 | Canopy closure (%) | | | | 46 | Height to live crown base
| | | | 47 | Snags and downed woody material
| | | | 48 | Size class distribution
| | | | 49 | Tree species composition
| | | | 50 | Presence/absence of invasive species None noted | | | 51 | Soil and other ecological data | | | | Post Treatment |  | | | 52 | Fuel load
| | | | 53 | Stem density (stems/ac)
| | | | 54 | Basal area (ft2/ac)
| | | | 55 | Canopy closure (%)
| | | | 56 | Height to live crown base
| | | | 57 | Snags and downed woody material
| | | | 58 | Size class distribution
| | | | 59 | Tree species composition
| | | | 60 | Presence/absence of invasive species None noted
| | | | 61 | Soil and other ecological data
| |
| |