Utilization of Landing Piles

Lakeview, OR
Bureau of Land Management, Klamath Falls Resource Area
Submitted by Mike Bechdolt, District Forester, Bureau of Land Management, Lakeview District
    
  
Project ID: 1010

1. Name - Utilization of Landing Piles

Context | Objectives | Treatment Specifics | Utilization | Targets | Pre Treatment data | Post Treatment data | Links

 
 

In the third project from the Klamath Falls Resource Area, "Utilization of Residual Timber Sale Landings", the BLM is using the stewardship contract to utilize old timber sale landing piles instead of burning them. This case study is an example of how a stewardship contract can be used in a flexible manner to address issues beyond standard harvests.

The project focuses on residual landings from 3,000 to 4,000 acres of commercial timber sales. The timber sale purchaser is not required to remove the landing debris, hence the BLM is taking care of the issue through the stewardship contractor at a subsidized rate. Material has been removed from approximately 50 to 100 landings so far, and more than 100 more landings have been tasked out. Two task orders have been issued: the first one in 2006 for 8,000 tons, and the second in 2007 for 10,000 tons.


The material is from mixed conifer and ponderosa pine stands. Residual timber sale landing material includes tops, culls, and submerchantable material that was cut and yarded concurrently with the cutting and yarding of commercial sawlogs. Under the timber sale, whole tree yarding is required, so thousands of tops were brought to the landing that did not meet commercial sawlog specifications. Approximately 1 to 4 tons of biomass in the form of non-sawlog material were generated from each acre of timber sale. Whole tree yarding is required to reduce the risk of adding fuels to the timber stand. By biomassing the landing piles, overall fuel loading is reduced, as are smoke emissions.

Instead of burning residual landing material, it is utilized as either clean chips or hog fuel. The BLM is encouraged to reduce smoke emissions when and where feasible. In some areas, other agencies do not have to subsidize the removal of such material, but are auctioning residual landing piles and getting $0.20 per CCF. In this case, the BLM receives $0.10 per ton for the material.

Contractors must have grinding equipment to grind the slash into certain sizes acceptable to the biomass plants. There are six biomass plants within a 250-mile radius. The furthest distance hauled to date has been to a plant in Anderson, California—about 250 miles. The biomass was carried as a "back haul" by a company transporting clean chip to Klamath Falls. The back haul allowed the vans to return with a transportable product instead of going back empty. The government subsidy rate varies from $15 to $23 per ton, depending upon haul distance and market. Hauling costs are approximately $2 per mile.

There has been a market for biomass in the surrounding area since late 1980, when northern California constructed a number of biomass plants.  A large biomass plant exists in Medford as well. The Klamath Falls Resource Area has been promoting biomass utilization since 1993, when it started requiring submerchantable thinning concurrent with commercial timber sale operations. It also required residual landing material to be hauled away as biomass for utilization.

Links

 

 2Land Ownership
Bureau of Land Management

 
 3Location
Lakeview, Oregon

 
4Forest Type
Mixed Conifer; Ponderosa Pine

 
 Context
 5Is this project a part of a landscape plan?
Yes

 
 6In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)?
Partially

 
 7Acreage treated
Landings from 3,000 to 4,000 ac of timber harvest

 
 8Type of contract
Stewardship contract

 
 9Funding source
Primarily fuel funding

 
 10Collaborators and partners
Stewardship Contractor / 3 Surrounding Biomass Facilities

 
 11Project start date
Sep. 2004

 
12Project completion date
Sep. 2014

 
 Treatment Goals
 13Restoration, watershed, or habitat improvement

 
 14Reduce fuel load

 
 15

 
 16

 
17Forest Stand Improvement

 
 Treatment Specifics
 18Primary treatment objective
Biomass removal
 
 19How does biomass removal fit with other objectives?
Main objective
 
 20Treatment description
Remove material from landing

 
 21Description of contractors
Contractors must have grinding equipment in order to grind the slash up into a certain piece size acceptable to the biomass plants.
 
 22Travel distance for contractors
Within a 250 mile radius, there are 6 biomass plants.
 
 23Type of equipment used
Grinders, Chip Vans, Front End Loaders
 
 24Treatment of residual slash if any
All landing slash is utilized for biomass.
 
 25Treatment cost per acre
Government subsidy rate varies from $15 to $23/Ton depending upon haul distance and market.
 
26Trucking costs
Hauling costs:  $2.00/mile
 
 Utilization
 27Products from project
Hog fuel for biomass energy plants
 
 28Price for products 
The BLM pays $15 - $23/ton depending upon haul distance, market, and other factors. The BLM receives $0.10/ton for the material.
 
 29Date of Sale
Two task orders have been issued: one in 2006 for 8,000 tons, another in 2007 for 10,000 tons.
 
 30Did biomass markets exist previous to project?
Yes
 
 31Type of utilization
Material is being utilized as hog fuel to fuel biomass plants.
 
 32How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options?
The woody biomass being generated can be utilized by the surrounding biomass facilities.
 
33Distance to utilization
70-250 miles
 
 Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations
 34Diameter limit

 
 35Basal area reduction

 
 36Crown coverage

 
 37Fuel loading
Project reduced fuel load on landings.
 
 38Retention guidelines
Not applicable - Standard retention guidelines for timber sales is 80-120 ft2/ac
 
 39Treatment of snags and downed logs

 
 40Soil impacts

 
41Other ecological impacts monitored
Reduced smoke emissions from biomass operations
 
 Pre Treatment
 42Fuel load

 
 43Stem density (stems/ac)

 
 44Basal area (ft2/ac)

 
 45Canopy closure (%)
 
 46Height to live crown base

 
 47Snags and downed woody material

 
 48Size class distribution

 
 49Tree species composition

 
 50Presence/absence of invasive species
None noted
 
51Soil and other ecological data

 
 Post Treatment
 52Fuel load

 
 53Stem density (stems/ac)

 
 54Basal area (ft2/ac)

 
 55Canopy closure (%)

 
 56Height to live crown base

 
 57Snags and downed woody material

 
 58Size class distribution

 
 59Tree species composition

 
 60Presence/absence of invasive species
None noted
 
 61Soil and other ecological data

 

 
PDFPrintE-mail
 
< Prev   Next >