Firewood Removal for Forest Stand Improvement in Transitional Hardwoods

Union, CT
Yale School Forest
Submitted by Richard Campbell, School Forests Manager, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies
  
Project ID: 1011

1. Name - Yale School Forest Firewood Thinning

Context | Objectives | Treatment Specifics | Utilization | Targets | Pre Treatment data | Post Treatment data |
Links
| Print & PDF

 
 

The Yale Forests are maintained as working forests, which includes selling timber and non-timber forest products from the land while also providing educational, research, and professional opportunities. The Yale Myers Forest is certified by both Forest Stweardship Council and Sustable Forestry Initiative. The Yale Myers Forest covers 7,840 acres in northeastern Connecticut. The forest is set on rocky terrain cut by a number of parallel, small ridges that run from southwest to northeast. The elevation varies from 190 meters to 330 meters and slopes rarely exceed 40%. The most recent period of glaciation covered the metamorphic bedrock with glacial till soils, which are moderate to well-drained sandy loams. The forest is a mix of hardwood, pine, and hemlock that grew after the area had been cleared for agriculture in the late 19th century. Much of the forest is even-aged at about 100 years old. Although there are many stands of quality hardwoods and white pine, regeneration goals often require removal of low-value hardwoods.

This example comes from an 18 acre sale than included two stands: 1) a 55-year-old even-aged white pine stand in the midst of understory reinitiation, 2) a second-growth hardwood stand about 90 years old in the late stem exclusion stage.

The silvicultural goal for the first stand was to reallocate available canopy growing space to the white pine crop trees with the best form and vigor. In addition, the harvest aimed to promote white pine regeneration by releasing the existing suppressed understory of white pine saplings, destroying the striped maple subcanopy, and redistributing enough growing space to the groundstory to allow for the establishment of new regeneration. The harvest was a crop tree thinning with variable spacing on the crop trees. In order to reallocate growing space to the suppressed understory, spacing between retained trees was up to 60 feet. In areas where existing regeneration was sufficiently well-established, the overstory was removed altogether.

The silvicultural goals for the second stand were also to improve the growth of crop trees and promote the establishment of desirable advanced regeneration. Crop trees, mostly oak, were left at approximately 30-foot spacing. Trees removed included firewood- and sawlog-sized trees that were poorly formed, diseased, or stressed, or individuals that had been overtopped by crop trees competing for growing space in the same canopy stratum. Most sugar maples and other shade-tolerant species were left because they were not in direct competition with the intolerant or mid-tolerant crop trees.

The total harvest generated about 61 thousand board feet (MBF) and about 11 cords of firewood. The site was harvested by a contractor with a Timbco feller buncher and rubber-tired forwarder. Sawtimber was taken to a local mill and firewood was also sold locally. Harwood prices ranged from $30 per MBF for hickory to $220 per MBF for red oak. Firewood was priced at $10 a cord, which is about equal to the cost of sale administration and removal so firewood generated no income for the landowner. Firewood markets in the area fluctuate from year to year. In some years, removal of low grade trees is a cost to the landowner. During weak firewood markets, sale of sawlogs must subsidize removal of low-grade trees where silvicultural concerns require their removal. Alternatively, forest stand improvement projects have often been postponed until firewood prices increase.

Wildlife considerations in the sale included mast trees, snags, and group reserves. Mature, seed-bearing oaks, hickories, and wolf trees retained in the stand will provide a continuing source of preferred hard mast for wildlife. Snags were left to provide habitat for cavity-dwelling birds and small mammals. Four trees were converted into snags via either topping or girdling. Two small group reserves of hemlock and Norway spruce will provide undisturbed thermal cover for deer and lend species diversity to the future stand.

In both stands the ability to remove suppressed and poorly formed trees was crucial to achieving the silvicultural goals. About five trees per acre, for a total of 92 trees, were removed to open up growing space for crop trees to encourage advanced regeneration. Without markets for firewood, it is difficult to achieve the regeneration goals in the forest, because stands remain too shaded to encourage shade-intolerant or mid-tolerant species.

Links

 






 

 

 2Land Ownership
University

 
 3Location
Union, Connecticut

 
4Forest Type
Transitional hardwoods

 
 Context
 5Is this project a part of a landscape plan?
No

 
 6 In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)?
No

 
 7Acreage treated
18 ac

 
 8Type of contract
Timber sale

 
 9Funding source
Not applicable

 
 10Collaborators and partners

 
 11Project start date
July 2006

 
12Project completion date
July 2006
 
 Treatment Goals
 13Restoration, watershed, or habitat improvement

 
 14

 
 15

 
 16

 
17Forest Stand Improvement

 
 Treatment Specifics
 18Primary treatment objective
Crop tree thinning
 
 19How does biomass removal fit with other objectives?
Side benefit
 
 20Treatment description
Crop tree thinning

 
 21Description of contractors
Local logging operation
 
 22Travel distance for contractors
Local.
 
 23Type of equipment used
TIMBCO feller buncher, forwarder
 
 24Treatment of residual slash if any
Reduce slash height to <2'
 
 25Treatment cost per acre
Break even
 
26Trucking costs
Not available
 
 Utilization
 27Products from project
Saw timber, firewood
 
 28Price for products 
Saw timber: $30 to $220/MBF; Firewood $10/cord
 
 29Date of Sale

 
 30Did biomass markets exist previous to project?
Yes. The firewood market in this area is sporadic
 
 31Type of utilization
Firewood
 
 32How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options?
Well
 
33Distance to utilization
<50 miles
 
 Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations
 34Diameter limit
None
 
 35Basal area reduction
15% reduction
 
 36Crown coverage
Not available
 
 37Fuel loading
Not applicable
 
 38Retention guidelines

 
 39Treatment of snags and downed logs
Retained or created where possible
 
 40Soil impacts

 
41Other ecological impacts monitored

 
 Pre Treatment
 42Fuel load

 
 43Stem density (stems/ac)
stand 1: 190; stand 2: 157
 
 44Basal area (ft2/ac)

 
 45Canopy closure (%)
 
 46Height to live crown base

 
 47Snags and downed woody material

 
 48Size class distribution
Stand 1: even aged 55 yrs; Stand 2: even aged 90 yrs
 
 49Tree species composition
Stand 1: mainly white pine; Stand 2 red oak, white oak, ash, white pine
 
 50Presence/absence of invasive species
None noted
 
51Soil and other ecological data

 
 Post Treatment
 52Fuel load

 
 53Stem density (stems/ac)
stand 1: 190; stand 2: 157
 
 54Basal area (ft2/ac)
 
 55Canopy closure (%)

 
 56Height to live crown base

 
 57Snags and downed woody material

 
 58Size class distribution

 
 59Tree species composition
Stand 1: mainly white pine; Stand 2 red oak, white oak, ash, white pine
 
 60Presence/absence of invasive species

 
 61Soil and other ecological data

 

 
PDFPrintE-mail
 
< Prev   Next >