Maple Regeneration Sale

Jefferson County, PA
Forecon, Inc
Submitted by Rick Constantino, Forecon, Inc.
  
Project ID: 1012

1. Name - Maple Regeneration Sale

Context | Objectives | Treatment Specifics | Utilization | Targets | Pre Treatment data | Post Treatment data |
Links
| Print & PDF

 
 

This project occurred in Jefferson County, Pennsylvania, on land owned by a Timber Investment Management Organization (TIMO) and managed by Forecon, Inc., a consulting forestry company. The entire property contains 697 contiguous acres on gently rolling terrain. The project profiled here covered 72 acres in an oak forest with small sawtimber size class. Prior to the cut, the basal area ranged from 120 to 150 square feet per acre.

A large amount of oak and red maple regeneration was present in the sale area. The oak was being browsed by deer, but not excessively. The sawtimber trees were not mature enough to justify a removal cut, but it was felt that too little sunlight was reaching the ground, the basal area was too high, and the trees were growing at a suboptimal rate.

Forecon, Inc. decided to conduct a shelterwood harvest that would remove a few lower quality sawtimber trees and the majority of the pulpwood in the stand. All timber to be cut was marked with paint. All sawtimber trees to be cut were measured, and 1/5-acre plots were used to estimate the pulpwood volume. After treatment, the stand was to support 50 to 60 square feet per acre of good quality sawtimber in a mix of red oak, white oak, chestnut oak, red maple, an occasional hard maple, black cherry, and yellow poplar. The sale ended up being low value with a large amount of pulpwood to be cut. There was some uncertainty about the feasibility of this sale, but it was felt that the sale was the best way to enhance the existing regeneration and add volume and value to the residual stand.

The sale was negotiated with a local sawmill that could utilize the pulpwood. The sale was cut by a two-man crew with a grapple skidder, and all trees were felled by hand. The pulpwood went to the local Weyerhauser (now Domtar) papermill (about 20 miles away), and the sawlogs went to a local sawmill. The sawtimber was sold for $455 per MBF while the pulpwood was priced at $2 per cord. The sale was cut in 2004, and today the regeneration is abundant and includes red oak, chestnut oak, white oak, red maple, and scattered black cherry and birch.

Links

 

 2Land Ownership
Private

 
 3Location
Jefferson County, Pennsylvania
 
4Forest Type
Oak hickory

 
 Context
 5Is this project a part of a landscape plan?
No

 
 6 In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)?
No

 
 7Acreage treated
72 ac

 
 8Type of contract
Timber sale

 
 9Funding source

 
 10Collaborators and partners
Private - TIMO

 
 11Project start date
Jan. 2004

 
12Project completion date
Nov. 2004
 
 Treatment Goals
 13Restoration, watershed or habitat improvement

 
 14

 
 15

 
 16

 
17Forest Stand Improvement

 
 Treatment Specifics
 18Primary treatment objective
Improve residual stand
 
 19How does biomass removal fit with other objectives?
Removing pulpwood increased value of sawtimber
 
 20Treatment description
Shelterwood

 
 21Description of contractors
Subcontractors - 2 man hand crew
 
 22Travel distance for contractors
30 miles
 
 23Type of equipment used
Hand felling/grapple skidder
 
 24Treatment of residual slash if any
Left on ground - protect seedlings from deer
 
 25Treatment cost per acre
Generated income
 
26Trucking costs
Not available
 
 Utilization
 27Products from project
Firewood, pulpwood, sawtimber
 
 28Price for products 
Sawtimber = $455/mbf(Doyle) Pulpwood = $2/cord
 
 29Date of Sale
January, 2004
 
 30Did biomass markets exist previous to project?
Yes
 
 31Type of utilization
To 4" top
 
 32How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options?
Hardwood chips to papermill
 
33Distance to utilization
20 miles
 
 Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations
 34Diameter limit
None
 
 35Basal area reduction
150 BA to 60 BA
 
 36Crown coverage
Residual trees clear on all sides
 
 37Fuel loading
Not applicable
 
 38Retention guidelines
Leave 50-60 BA in residual stand
 
 39Treatment of snags and downed logs
Snags left standing
 
 40Soil impacts
Minimal from skidder tires
 
41Other ecological impacts monitored

 
 Pre Treatment
 42Fuel load

 
 43Stem density (stems/ac)

 
 44Basal area (ft2/ac)
120-150 sq ft
 
 45Canopy closure (%)
80% estimate
 
 46Height to live crown base
45-50 feet - estimated
 
 47Snags and downed woody material
Plenty
 
 48Size class distribution
Small sawtimber
 
 49Tree species composition
Oak, maple
 
 50Presence/absence of invasive species
None noted
 
51Soil and other ecological data
GgA - Gilpin silt loam 0-5% slope
 
 Post Treatment
 52Fuel load

 
 53Stem density (stems/ac)

 
 54Basal area (ft2/ac)
60-90 sq ft
 
 55Canopy closure (%)
40-50%
 
 56Height to live crown base
45-50 feet - estimated
 
 57Snags and downed woody material
More debris on ground - tops
 
 58Size class distribution
Small saw timber 15.0-17.9 inches
 
 59Tree species composition
Oak, Maple
 
 60Presence/absence of invasive species

 
 61Soil and other ecological data

 

 
PDFPrintE-mail
 
< Prev   Next >