| | This project occurred in Jefferson County, Pennsylvania, on land owned by a Timber Investment Management Organization (TIMO) and managed by Forecon, Inc., a consulting forestry company. The entire property contains 697 contiguous acres on gently rolling terrain. The project profiled here covered 72 acres in an oak forest with small sawtimber size class. Prior to the cut, the basal area ranged from 120 to 150 square feet per acre. A large amount of oak and red maple regeneration was present in the sale area. The oak was being browsed by deer, but not excessively. The sawtimber trees were not mature enough to justify a removal cut, but it was felt that too little sunlight was reaching the ground, the basal area was too high, and the trees were growing at a suboptimal rate. Forecon, Inc. decided to conduct a shelterwood harvest that would remove a few lower quality sawtimber trees and the majority of the pulpwood in the stand. All timber to be cut was marked with paint. All sawtimber trees to be cut were measured, and 1/5-acre plots were used to estimate the pulpwood volume. After treatment, the stand was to support 50 to 60 square feet per acre of good quality sawtimber in a mix of red oak, white oak, chestnut oak, red maple, an occasional hard maple, black cherry, and yellow poplar. The sale ended up being low value with a large amount of pulpwood to be cut. There was some uncertainty about the feasibility of this sale, but it was felt that the sale was the best way to enhance the existing regeneration and add volume and value to the residual stand. The sale was negotiated with a local sawmill that could utilize the pulpwood. The sale was cut by a two-man crew with a grapple skidder, and all trees were felled by hand. The pulpwood went to the local Weyerhauser (now Domtar) papermill (about 20 miles away), and the sawlogs went to a local sawmill. The sawtimber was sold for $455 per MBF while the pulpwood was priced at $2 per cord. The sale was cut in 2004, and today the regeneration is abundant and includes red oak, chestnut oak, white oak, red maple, and scattered black cherry and birch. Links | | | | 2 | Land Ownership Private
| | | | 3 | Location Jefferson County, Pennsylvania
| | | 4 | Forest Type Oak hickory
| | | | Context |  | | | 5 | Is this project a part of a landscape plan? No
| | | | 6 | In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)? No
| | | | 7 | Acreage treated 72 ac
| | | | 8 | Type of contract Timber sale
| | | | 9 | Funding source
| | | | 10 | Collaborators and partners Private - TIMO
| | | | 11 | Project start date Jan. 2004
| | | 12 | Project completion date Nov. 2004
| | | | Treatment Goals |  | | | 13 | Restoration, watershed or habitat improvement
| | | | 14 |
| | | | 15 |
| | | | 16 |
| | | 17 | Forest Stand Improvement
| | | | Treatment Specifics |  | | | 18 | Primary treatment objective Improve residual stand
| | | | 19 | How does biomass removal fit with other objectives? Removing pulpwood increased value of sawtimber | | | | 20 | Treatment description Shelterwood
| | | | 21 | Description of contractors Subcontractors - 2 man hand crew | | | | 22 | Travel distance for contractors 30 miles | | | | 23 | Type of equipment used Hand felling/grapple skidder
| | | | 24 | Treatment of residual slash if any Left on ground - protect seedlings from deer
| | | | 25 | Treatment cost per acre Generated income | | | 26 | Trucking costs Not available
| | | | Utilization |  | | | 27 | Products from project Firewood, pulpwood, sawtimber | | | | 28 | Price for products Sawtimber = $455/mbf(Doyle) Pulpwood = $2/cord
| | | | 29 | Date of Sale January, 2004
| | | | 30 | Did biomass markets exist previous to project? Yes
| | | | 31 | Type of utilization To 4" top
| | | | 32 | How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options? Hardwood chips to papermill | | | 33 | Distance to utilization 20 miles
| | | | Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations |  | | | 34 | Diameter limit None | | | | 35 | Basal area reduction 150 BA to 60 BA | | | | 36 | Crown coverage Residual trees clear on all sides
| | | | 37 | Fuel loading Not applicable
| | | | 38 | Retention guidelines Leave 50-60 BA in residual stand
| | | | 39 | Treatment of snags and downed logs Snags left standing | | | | 40 | Soil impacts Minimal from skidder tires | | | 41 | Other ecological impacts monitored
| | | | Pre Treatment |  | | | 42 | Fuel load | | | | 43 | Stem density (stems/ac)
| | | | 44 | Basal area (ft2/ac) 120-150 sq ft | | | | 45 | Canopy closure (%) 80% estimate | | | | 46 | Height to live crown base 45-50 feet - estimated
| | | | 47 | Snags and downed woody material Plenty
| | | | 48 | Size class distribution Small sawtimber | | | | 49 | Tree species composition Oak, maple | | | | 50 | Presence/absence of invasive species None noted | | | 51 | Soil and other ecological data GgA - Gilpin silt loam 0-5% slope | | | | Post Treatment |  | | | 52 | Fuel load
| | | | 53 | Stem density (stems/ac)
| | | | 54 | Basal area (ft2/ac) 60-90 sq ft | | | | 55 | Canopy closure (%) 40-50%
| | | | 56 | Height to live crown base 45-50 feet - estimated | | | | 57 | Snags and downed woody material More debris on ground - tops | | | | 58 | Size class distribution Small saw timber 15.0-17.9 inches
| | | | 59 | Tree species composition Oak, Maple
| | | | 60 | Presence/absence of invasive species | | | | 61 | Soil and other ecological data
| |
| |