| | In 2005, the Royal Gorge Field Office (RGFO) was approved as a BLM National Biomass Demonstration Site. Through the Arkansas Mountain Stewardship Contract, RGFO was able to improve forest health, reduce fuels and risk of crown fire, encourage biomass utilization, improve wildlife habitat, and provide wood to the local forest industry. The project supplied the Aquila Power Plant in Canon City, Colorado, which generates 42 MW of electricity with a combination of coal and wood.
The project focused on mixed conifer forests along the Colorado Front Range, which have become uncharacteristically dense as a result of fire suppression, grazing, and past timber harvests that concentrated on removing the larger trees. As with many forests in the area, the stands were well outside of historic fire intervals and laden with heavy fuel loads. Such conditions have led to some of the most destructive wildfires and largest bark beetle outbreaks since the settlement of Colorado. Failure to treat these overstocked forests may have destructive impacts on the forests, watersheds, and surrounding communities.
The silvicultural prescription for the Arkansas Mountain Stewardship Project was designed to move forest conditions toward lower density stand structures and retain the largest healthy trees. After the treatment, stand structures appeared more open and trees were more clumped and patchy. The timber harvest maintained all size classes to encourage an uneven-aged structure. The contractor used a hydro-axe with felling head, skidder, chipper, and chip vans to move the biomass from stump to plant. The treatment removed up to 2000 stems acre and reduced the basal area by about 70%. The fuel loading was reduced from 11 to 5 tons acre and canopy closure was reduced to about 25%. The treatment generated approximately 16 tons of woodchips per acre and 46 MBF of sawtimber. Prescribed burning will reduce natural and activity fuels, help re-establish a more frequent fire interval, and provide a nutrient flush to residual vegetation.  | |  |
The RGFO accomplished the project through stewardship contracts. Under a stewardship contract, the value of vegetative material can be applied to offset the cost of services received. The service cost for these stewardship contracts was approximately $1,000 per acre and biomass removal accounted for about $800 of that cost. These contracts included additional activities such as meadow restoration, gate installation, and road maintenance and improvement. Service costs for the stewardship contracts were higher than expected but costs are expected to drop in the future as the local forest industry and Aqulia become more accustomed to utilizing biomass. The RGFO is planning to utilize several thousand tons of forest biomass each year over the next five years.
As fuels and stand densities are reduced on public lands, wildfire intensity and severity will be lessened, resulting in lower wildfire suppression costs. Air emissions will also be improved by eliminating the need for on-site slash-pile burning. Also woodchips utilized at the Power Plant will emit fewer harmful chemicals when compared to coal. In addition, the projects meet many of the goals of the National Fire Plan and Cohesive Strategy, the Healthy Forests Initiative, and the Healthy Forests Restoration Act.

 Aquila Power Plant and biomass from BLM project. Links
| | | | 2 | Land Ownership Bureau of Land Management
| | | | 3 | Location Canon City, Colorado | | | 4 | Forest Type Mixed conifer
| | | | Context |  | | | 5 | Is this project a part of a landscape plan? Yes
| | | | 6 | In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)? Yes
| | | | 7 | Acreage treated 100 ac
| | | | 8 | Type of contract Stewardship contract
| | | | 9 | Funding source Forestry/Fuels
| | | | 10 | Collaborators and partners Aquila Power Plant/ Kansas University
| | | | 11 | Project start date Aug. 2006
| | | 12 | Project completion date Sep. 2007
| | | | Treatment Goals |  | | | 13 | Restoration, watershed, or habitat improvement
| | | | 14 | Reduce fuel load
| | | | 15 | Fire break
| | | | 16 |
| | | 17 | Forest Stand Improvement
| | | | Treatment Specifics |  | | | 18 | Primary treatment objective Forest Health & Fuels Reduction | | | | 19 | How does biomass removal fit with other objectives? Great - removed many small trees
| | | | 20 | Treatment description Forest restoration
| | | | 21 | Description of contractors Local loggers | | | | 22 | Travel distance for contractors 40 miles from project to biomass utilization facility, camped on site
| | | | 23 | Type of equipment used Hydro-axe with felling head, Skidder, Chipper, Chip Vans | | | | 24 | Treatment of residual slash if any Chipped and removed
| | | | 25 | Treatment cost per acre Total contract cost about $1,000/ac Biomass removal about $800/ac
| | | 26 | Trucking costs $400/load
| | | | Utilization |  | | | 27 | Products from project About 16 tons/ac of chips; Sawtimber - 26MBF ponderosa, 20MBF Douglas-fir | | | | 28 | Price for products Ponderosa $17/MBF, Douglas-fir $109/MBF | | | | 29 | Date of Sale August 2006
| | | | 30 | Did biomass markets exist previous to project? Yes
| | | | 31 | Type of utilization Coal burning power plant
| | | | 32 | How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options? Dirty woodchips with bark, needles, cones worked good. There were problems with past non-BLM woodchip size and species
| | | 33 | Distance to utilization 40 miles
| | | | Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations |  | | | 34 | Diameter limit None
| | | | 35 | Basal area reduction 70%
| | | | 36 | Crown coverage
| | | | 37 | Fuel loading
| | | | 38 | Retention guidelines All trees marked with orange paint over 5 inches DBH; seedlings/sapling spaced 15 feet apart, all cleared within 30 of a designated with orange paint
| | | | 39 | Treatment of snags and downed logs Reserved most snags, no treatment of downed logs
| | | | 40 | Soil impacts No operating when the ground is wet
| | | 41 | Other ecological impacts monitored No operating during migratory bird nesting
| | | | Pre Treatment |  | | | 42 | Fuel load 11 tons/acre estimated from fuels photos
| | | | 43 | Stem density (stems/ac) 2149
| | | | 44 | Basal area (ft2/ac) 171
| | | | 45 | Canopy closure (%) 65%
| | | | 46 | Height to live crown base 15 feet
| | | | 47 | Snags and downed woody material 1 snag/acre, no data on downed large logs estimate 1/acre
| | | | 48 | Size class distribution 85% .1-4.9 DBH, 10%-5-10 DBH, 5% >10 DBH
| | | | 49 | Tree species composition 60% ponderosa pine, 35% Douglas-fir, 5% other (pinyon pine, juniper, white fir)
| | | | 50 | Presence/absence of invasive species Absent
| | | 51 | Soil and other ecological data Soil sample collected by 3rd party monioting
| | | | Post Treatment |  | | | 52 | Fuel load 5 tons/acre estimated from fuels photos
| | | | 53 | Stem density (stems/ac) 136
| | | | 54 | Basal area (ft2/ac) 50
| | | | 55 | Canopy closure (%) ~25% | | | | 56 | Height to live crown base 25 feet
| | | | 57 | Snags and downed woody material 1 snag/acre, no data on downed logs estimate 1/acre
| | | | 58 | Size class distribution 26% .1-4.9 DBH, 39% 5-10 DBH, 35% >10 DBH | | | | 59 | Tree species composition 74% ponderosa pine, 25% Douglas-fir, 1% other
| | | | 60 | Presence/absence of invasive species Absent | | | | 61 | Soil and other ecological data Soil sample collected by 3rd party monioting
| |
| |