Arkansas Mountain Stewardship Project

Canon City, CO
Bureau of Land Management
Submitted by Ken Reed, Bureau of Land Management, Royal Gorge Field Office
    
  
Project ID: 1020

1. Name - Arkansas Mountain Stewardship Project

Context | Objectives | Treatment Specifics | Utilization | Targets | Pre Treatment data | Post Treatment data | Links 

 
 

In 2005, the Royal Gorge Field Office (RGFO) was approved as a BLM National Biomass Demonstration Site. Through the Arkansas Mountain Stewardship Contract, RGFO was able to improve forest health, reduce fuels and risk of crown fire, encourage biomass utilization, improve wildlife habitat, and provide wood to the local forest industry. The project supplied the Aquila Power Plant in Canon City, Colorado, which generates 42 MW of electricity with a combination of coal and wood.

The project focused on mixed conifer forests along the Colorado Front Range, which have become uncharacteristically dense as a result of fire suppression, grazing, and past timber harvests that concentrated on removing the larger trees. As with many forests in the area, the stands were well outside of historic fire intervals and laden with heavy fuel loads. Such conditions have led to some of the most destructive wildfires and largest bark beetle outbreaks since the settlement of Colorado. Failure to treat these overstocked forests may have destructive impacts on the forests, watersheds, and surrounding communities.

The silvicultural prescription for the Arkansas Mountain Stewardship Project was designed to move forest conditions toward lower density stand structures and retain the largest healthy trees. After the treatment, stand structures appeared more open and trees were more clumped and patchy. The timber harvest maintained all size classes to encourage an uneven-aged structure. The contractor used a hydro-axe with felling head, skidder, chipper, and chip vans to move the biomass from stump to plant. The treatment removed up to 2000 stems acre and reduced the basal area by about 70%. The fuel loading was reduced from 11 to 5 tons acre and canopy closure was reduced to about 25%. The treatment generated approximately 16 tons of woodchips per acre and 46 MBF of sawtimber. Prescribed burning will reduce natural and activity fuels, help re-establish a more frequent fire interval, and provide a nutrient flush to residual vegetation.

  


The RGFO accomplished the project through stewardship contracts. Under a stewardship contract, the value of vegetative material can be applied to offset the cost of services received. The service cost for these stewardship contracts was approximately $1,000 per acre and biomass removal accounted for about $800 of that cost. These contracts included additional activities such as meadow restoration, gate installation, and road maintenance and improvement. Service costs for the stewardship contracts were higher than expected but costs are expected to drop in the future as the local forest industry and Aqulia become more accustomed to utilizing biomass. The RGFO is planning to utilize several thousand tons of forest biomass each year over the next five years.

As fuels and stand densities are reduced on public lands, wildfire intensity and severity will be lessened, resulting in lower wildfire suppression costs. Air emissions will also be improved by eliminating the need for on-site slash-pile burning. Also woodchips utilized at the Power Plant will emit fewer harmful chemicals when compared to coal. In addition, the projects meet many of the goals of the National Fire Plan and Cohesive Strategy, the Healthy Forests Initiative, and the Healthy Forests Restoration Act.




Aquila Power Plant and biomass from BLM project.


Links
 

 2Land Ownership
Bureau of Land Management

 
 3Location
Canon City, Colorado
 
4Forest Type
Mixed conifer

 
 Context
 5Is this project a part of a landscape plan?
Yes

 
 6In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)?
Yes

 
 7Acreage treated
100 ac
 
 8Type of contract
Stewardship contract
 
 9Funding source
Forestry/Fuels
 
 10Collaborators and partners
Aquila Power Plant/ Kansas University
 
 11Project start date
Aug. 2006
 
12Project completion date
Sep. 2007
 
 Treatment Goals
 13Restoration, watershed, or habitat improvement

 
 14Reduce fuel load

 
 15Fire break

 
 16

 
17Forest Stand Improvement

 
 Treatment Specifics
 18Primary treatment objective
Forest Health & Fuels Reduction
 
 19How does biomass removal fit with other objectives?
Great - removed many small trees
 
 20Treatment description
Forest restoration
 
 21Description of contractors
Local loggers
 
 22Travel distance for contractors
40 miles from project to biomass utilization facility, camped on site
 
 23Type of equipment used
Hydro-axe with felling head, Skidder, Chipper, Chip Vans
 
 24Treatment of residual slash if any
Chipped and removed
 
 25Treatment cost per acre
Total contract cost about $1,000/ac
Biomass removal about $800/ac
 
26Trucking costs
$400/load
 
 Utilization
 27Products from project
About 16 tons/ac of chips; Sawtimber - 26MBF ponderosa, 20MBF Douglas-fir
 
 28Price for products 
Ponderosa $17/MBF, Douglas-fir $109/MBF
 
 29Date of Sale
August 2006
 
 30Did biomass markets exist previous to project?
Yes
 
 31Type of utilization
Coal burning power plant
 
 32How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options?
Dirty woodchips with bark, needles, cones worked good. There were problems with past non-BLM woodchip size and species
 
33Distance to utilization
40 miles
 
 Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations
 34Diameter limit
None
 
 35Basal area reduction
70%
 
 36Crown coverage

 
 37Fuel loading

 
 38Retention guidelines
All trees marked with orange paint over 5 inches DBH; seedlings/sapling spaced 15 feet apart, all cleared within 30 of a designated with orange paint
 
 39Treatment of snags and downed logs
Reserved most snags, no treatment of downed logs
 
 40Soil impacts
No operating when the ground is wet
 
41Other ecological impacts monitored
No operating during migratory bird nesting
 
 Pre Treatment
 42Fuel load
11 tons/acre estimated from fuels photos
 
 43Stem density (stems/ac)
2149
 
 44Basal area (ft2/ac)
171
 
 45Canopy closure (%)
65%
 
 46Height to live crown base
15 feet
 
 47Snags and downed woody material
1 snag/acre, no data on downed large logs estimate 1/acre
 
 48Size class distribution
85% .1-4.9 DBH, 10%-5-10 DBH, 5% >10 DBH
 
 49Tree species composition
60% ponderosa pine, 35% Douglas-fir, 5% other (pinyon pine, juniper, white fir)
 
 50Presence/absence of invasive species
Absent
 
51Soil and other ecological data
Soil sample collected by 3rd party monioting
 
 Post Treatment
 52Fuel load
5 tons/acre estimated from fuels photos
 
 53Stem density (stems/ac)
136
 
 54Basal area (ft2/ac)
50
 
 55Canopy closure (%)
~25%
 
 56Height to live crown base
25 feet
 
 57Snags and downed woody material
1 snag/acre, no data on downed logs estimate 1/acre
 
 58Size class distribution
26% .1-4.9 DBH, 39% 5-10 DBH, 35% >10 DBH
 
 59Tree species composition
74% ponderosa pine, 25% Douglas-fir, 1% other
 
 60Presence/absence of invasive species
Absent
 
 61Soil and other ecological data
Soil sample collected by 3rd party monioting
 

 
PDFPrintE-mail
 
< Prev   Next >