Transportation Corridors Fuels Reduction Stewardship Project

Elk City, ID
Framing Our Community and Bureau of Land Management
Submitted by Joyce Dearstyne, Executive Director, Framing Our Community
    
  
Project ID: 1029

1. Name - Transportation Corridor Fuels Reduction

Context | Objectives | Treatment Specifics | Utilization | Targets | Pre Treatment Data | Post Treatment Data | Links 

 
 This project was a partnership between Framing Our Community (FOC), a nonprofit group, and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). By working together they were able to build community support for, and implement a fuels-reduction project in a high-risk road area. FOC's purpose is to foster the sustainable use of natural resources and eliminate the rural poverty in communities dependent on federally managed natural resources. Since the mid-1990s they have been investigating the opportunity of value-added wood products developed from small-diameter, dead, and diseased timber. FOC has also helped to develop and implement on-the-ground techniques and training for forest restoration, fuels-reduction and defensible space programs. In addition to the fuels-reduction project profiled here, FOC is also working with the BLM on several other projects, including additional fencing of the stream corridor along Elk Creek to prevent livestock grazing, and decommissioning of road segments on private and BLM land.

The goal of the Elk City Transportation Corridors Hazardous Fuels Reduction Stewardship Project was to reduce hazardous fuel loads, woody biomass, and hazard trees from the roadsides of American River Road in Elk City, Idaho. American River Road is the only access to a subdivision and needed to be protected in the event of a wildfire. A total of 18 acres were treated by local workers. Many of the green sawlogs were sent to the Bennett Forest Industries mill in Grangeville, Idaho (50 miles), while the small diameter and non-sawlogs were sent to the Elk City Small Business Incubator. Value-added wood products businesses in the incubator produced bundled firewood, fencing, shade trellis, and custom-cut, dimensional timber from these. Pulp-grade logs were sent to Grainger in Lewiston, Idaho (125 miles). The project produced 808 tons of sawlogs and 800 tons of non-sawlogs.

The predominant species in the project area was lodgepole pine that was at the end of its life cycle and either dead, dying, or infested with bark beetle. The pine was interspersed with weakened white fir. The prescription called for the removal of all overstory lodgepole pine and for thinning the remaining overstory trees to 10- to 15-foot spacing. The understory was also thinned to 15-foot spacing, with understory trees retained in this order of preference: western larch, ponderosa pine, Douglas-fir, and lodgepole pine. All remaining trees were pruned to a height of 10 feet. All residual slash from the project was piled and burned on site.




Links
 

 2Land Ownership
Bureau of Land Management

 
 3Location
Elk City, Idaho
 
4Forest Type
Lodgepole pine

 
 Context
 5Is this project a part of a landscape plan?
Yes

 
 6In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)?
Yes

 
 7Acreage treated
18 ac
 
 8Type of contract
Stewardship contract
 
 9Funding source

 
 10Collaborators and partners
Framing Our Community
 
 11Project start date
Mar. 2002
 
12Project completion date
Jan. 2007
 
 Treatment Goals
 13

 
 14Reduce fuel load

 
 15

 
 16

 
17

 
 Treatment Specifics
 18Primary treatment objective
Reduce hazardous fuels.
 
 19How does biomass removal fit with other objectives?
Biomass removal links hazardous fuel reduction with job creation.
 
 20Treatment description
Heavy Thin: Remove all overstory lodgepole pine and thin remaining overstory to 10-15 ft spacing.
 
 21Description of contractors
Local workers
 
 22Travel distance for contractors
Local
 
 23Type of equipment used
Hand felling
 
 24Treatment of residual slash if any
Piled and burned
 
 25Treatment cost per acre

 
26Trucking costs

 
 Utilization
 27Products from project
Sawtimber, pulp, firewood, fencing
 
 28Price for products 

 
 29Date of Sale

 
 30Did biomass markets exist previous to project?
Yes
 
 31Type of utilization
Bundled firewood, fencing, shade trellis and custom cut dimensional timber
 
 32How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options?
Well
 
33Distance to utilization
Sawtimber: 50 miles; Pulp: 125 miles
 
 Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations
 34Diameter limit
No
 
 35Basal area reduction

 
 36Crown coverage

 
 37Fuel loading

 
 38Retention guidelines
15 foot spacing, healthy trees
 
 39Treatment of snags and downed logs
Downed logs left
 
 40Soil impacts
Minimized by yarding and use of existing skid trails
 
41Other ecological impacts monitored

 
 Pre Treatment
 42Fuel load

 
 43Stem density (stems/ac)

 
 44Basal area (ft2/ac)

 
 45Canopy closure (%)

 
 46Height to live crown base

 
 47Snags and downed woody material

 
 48Size class distribution

 
 49Tree species composition

 
 50Presence/absence of invasive species

 
51Soil and other ecological data

 
 Post Treatment
 52Fuel load

 
 53Stem density (stems/ac)

 
 54Basal area (ft2/ac)

 
 55Canopy closure (%)

 
 56Height to live crown base
Pruned to at least 10 ft
 
 57Snags and downed woody material

 
 58Size class distribution

 
 59Tree species composition

 
 60Presence/absence of invasive species

 
 61Soil and other ecological data

 

 
PDFPrintE-mail
 
< Prev   Next >