| | On June 7, 2007, an “F3” tornado ripped at least a 40-mile path, half a mile wide, cross Northeast Wisconsin. Severity of this magnitude, with winds between 140 and 160 miles per hour, is very unusual for the region.
According to Marshall Pecore, Forest Manager for Menominee Tribal Enterprises, the tornado cut through high-value hardwood forestland (fortunately, for the most part uninhabited). He says that 3,000 acres of tribal lands were affected, with 2,200 acres “completely flattened.” Downed wood comprised an estimated 30,000,000 board feet of sawlogs and 50,000 cords of pulpwood, pointed in all directions and blown into piles of multiple layers. This immense volume had to be harvested quickly, efficiently, and safely.
 MTE had to map the destruction, clear roads, and impose extraordinary safety precautions, as well as ensure that the existing and additional logging companies all had training in the skills they would need to work in the unusual circumstances (including “special hazard” chain saw training, provided by independent trainer, Ken Lallemont). MTE cleared and created seven helicopter pads in the damaged area to make sure that in the event of an injury, rapid evacuation would be available. It was, of course, also imperative to find a market for this additional fiber, so MTE contacted customers to obtain assurances that volumes specified in existing contracts would be honored or increased.
Shovel Logging Patrick Meverden, owner of Meverden Trucking and Logging, was one of at least two loggers who decided to use a Thunderbird 1146 tracked log shovel in this blow-down harvest operation. A very large machine by today’s Lake States standards, the Thunderbird uses a 325 horsepower Cummins L10TA industrial motor and burns 8 to 12 gallons of fuel per hour. Track-to-track width is nearly 14 feet, with each individual track measuring 17 feet long and 30 inches wide.
Meverden’s machine has a reach of 51 feet (including the grapple), but the same machine can be purchased with an additional 23-foot reach. Another notable feature is the relatively high elevation of the operator’s compartment. Typically operated in wet or mountainous terrain in the Southeast, these machines are used for a logging method known as “shovel logging”—moving through the harvest area, grabbing trees or piles of wood and swinging them around so that they are closer to the access road. Several passes of this sort may be required to get the wood to the roadside, depending on how far from the road the harvest extends. It can be a practical alternative to skidding, when conditions make skidding inadvisable.

Operation In this salvage situation, Meverden used the Thunderbird to organize the timber “jackstraws” for convenient and safe handling. It grabbed each tree in its path and laid it down perpendicular to that path, with the root balls or butts of the trees positioned toward the path, and any uprooted stumps placed close to it. A 415 Timbco with a 7000 Logmax head and a 33-foot squirt boom followed the Thunderbird closely.
Application Sorting the timber in this way greatly increased safety. In addition, the overall size of the machine, with the cab’s high perch, gave the operator an unusually broad overview of the operating environment. The Thunderbird’s size, and the length of its arm, helped greatly in handling wood under high tension. Furthermore, the system increased time/cost efficiency substantially in comparison to alternative methods. Merverden estimates that this configuration reduced the time spent on blowdown salvage by half, since the Thunderbird’s long reach made it unnecessary to provide extra access for the other machines.
Links | | | | 2 | Land Ownership Tribal
| | | | 3 | Location Menominee, Wisconsin
| | | 4 | Forest Type Northern hardwood
| | | | Context |  | | | 5 | Is this project a part of a landscape plan? Yes
| | | | 6 | In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)?
| | | | 7 | Acreage treated
| | | | 8 | Type of contract
| | | | 9 | Funding source
| | | | 10 | Collaborators and partners
| | | | 11 | Project start date June 2007
| | | 12 | Project completion date October 2007 | | | | Treatment Goals |  | | | 13 |
| | | | 14 |
| | | | 15 |
| | | | 16 | Salvage
| | | 17 |
| | | | Treatment Specifics |  | | | 18 | Primary treatment objective Salvage downed timber | | | | 19 | How does biomass removal fit with other objectives? Well
| | | | 20 | Treatment description
| | | | 21 | Description of contractors
| | | | 22 | Travel distance for contractors
| | | | 23 | Type of equipment used Thunderbird 1146 tracked log shovel 415 Timbco with a 7000 Logmax head
| | | | 24 | Treatment of residual slash if any
| | | | 25 | Treatment cost per acre
| | | 26 | Trucking costs
| | | | Utilization |  | | | 27 | Products from project
| | | | 28 | Price for products
| | | | 29 | Date of Sale
| | | | 30 | Did biomass markets exist previous to project? No | | | | 31 | Type of utilization
| | | | 32 | How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options?
| | | 33 | Distance to utilization
| | | | Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations |  | | | 34 | Diameter limit
| | | | 35 | Basal area reduction
| | | | 36 | Crown coverage
| | | | 37 | Fuel loading
| | | | 38 | Retention guidelines
| | | | 39 | Treatment of snags and downed logs
| | | | 40 | Soil impacts
| | | 41 | Other ecological impacts monitored
| | | | Pre Treatment |  | | | 42 | Fuel load
| | | | 43 | Stem density (stems/ac)
| | | | 44 | Basal area (ft2/ac)
| | | | 45 | Canopy closure (%)
| | | | 46 | Height to live crown base
| | | | 47 | Snags and downed woody material
| | | | 48 | Size class distribution
| | | | 49 | Tree species composition
| | | | 50 | Presence/absence of invasive species
| | | 51 | Soil and other ecological data
| | | | Post Treatment |  | | | 52 | Fuel load
| | | | 53 | Stem density (stems/ac)
| | | | 54 | Basal area (ft2/ac)
| | | | 55 | Canopy closure (%)
| | | | 56 | Height to live crown base
| | | | 57 | Snags and downed woody material
| | | | 58 | Size class distribution
| | | | 59 | Tree species composition
| | | | 60 | Presence/absence of invasive species
| | | | 61 | Soil and other ecological data
| |
| |