Shovel Logging in Tornado Salvage

Menominee, WI
Case study from Technical Relsease (08-R-3) by Kent Mikkelson and published by the Forest Resources Association Inc.
  
Project ID: 1045

1. Name - Shovel Logging in Tornado Salvage

Context | Objectives | Treatment Specifics | Utilization | Targets | Pre Treatment Data | Post Treatment Data | Links 

 
 On June 7, 2007, an “F3” tornado ripped at least a 40-mile path, half a mile wide, cross Northeast Wisconsin. Severity of this magnitude, with winds between 140 and 160 miles per hour, is very unusual for the region.

According to Marshall Pecore, Forest Manager for Menominee Tribal
Enterprises, the tornado cut through high-value hardwood forestland
(fortunately, for the most part uninhabited). He says that 3,000 acres
of tribal lands were affected, with 2,200 acres “completely flattened.” Downed wood comprised an estimated 30,000,000 board feet of sawlogs and 50,000 cords of pulpwood, pointed in all directions and blown into piles of multiple layers. This immense volume had to be harvested quickly, efficiently, and safely.

MTE had to map the destruction, clear roads, and impose extraordinary safety precautions, as well as ensure that the existing and additional logging companies all had training in the skills they would need to work in the unusual circumstances (including “special hazard” chain saw training, provided by independent trainer, Ken Lallemont). MTE cleared and created seven helicopter pads in the damaged area to make sure that in the event of an injury, rapid evacuation would be available. It was, of course, also imperative to find a market for this additional fiber, so MTE contacted customers to obtain assurances that volumes specified in existing contracts would be honored or increased.

Shovel Logging
Patrick Meverden, owner of Meverden Trucking and Logging, was one of at least two loggers who decided to use a Thunderbird 1146 tracked log shovel in this blow-down harvest operation. A very large machine by today’s Lake States standards, the Thunderbird uses a 325 horsepower Cummins L10TA industrial motor and burns 8 to 12 gallons of fuel per hour. Track-to-track width is nearly 14 feet, with each individual track measuring 17 feet long and 30 inches wide.

Meverden’s machine has a reach of 51 feet (including the grapple), but the same machine can be purchased with an additional 23-foot reach. Another notable feature is the relatively high elevation of the
operator’s compartment. Typically operated in wet or mountainous terrain in the Southeast, these machines are used for a logging
method known as “shovel logging”—moving through the harvest area, grabbing trees or piles of wood and swinging them around so that they are closer to the access road. Several passes of this sort may be required to get the wood to the roadside, depending on how far from the road the harvest extends. It can be a practical alternative to skidding, when conditions make skidding inadvisable.



Operation
In this salvage situation, Meverden used the Thunderbird to organize the timber “jackstraws” for convenient and safe handling. It grabbed each tree in its path and laid it down perpendicular to that path, with the root balls or butts of the trees positioned toward the path, and any uprooted stumps placed close to it. A 415 Timbco with a 7000 Logmax head and a 33-foot squirt boom followed the Thunderbird closely.

Application
Sorting the timber in this way greatly increased safety. In addition, the overall size of the machine, with the cab’s high perch, gave the operator an unusually broad overview of the operating environment. The Thunderbird’s size, and the length of its arm, helped greatly in handling wood under high tension. Furthermore, the system increased time/cost efficiency substantially in comparison to alternative methods. Merverden estimates that this configuration reduced the time spent on blowdown salvage by half, since the Thunderbird’s long reach made it unnecessary to provide extra access for the other machines.


Links

 

 2Land Ownership
Tribal

 
 3Location
Menominee, Wisconsin
 
4Forest Type
Northern hardwood

 
 Context
 5Is this project a part of a landscape plan?
Yes
 
 6In a Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)?

 
 7Acreage treated

 
 8Type of contract

 
 9Funding source

 
 10Collaborators and partners

 
 11Project start date
June 2007
 
12Project completion date
October 2007
 
 Treatment Goals
 13

 
 14

 
 15

 
 16Salvage

 
17

 
 Treatment Specifics
 18Primary treatment objective
Salvage downed timber
 
 19How does biomass removal fit with other objectives?
Well
 
 20Treatment description

 
 21Description of contractors

 
 22Travel distance for contractors

 
 23Type of equipment used
Thunderbird 1146 tracked log shovel
415 Timbco with a 7000 Logmax head
 
 24Treatment of residual slash if any

 
 25Treatment cost per acre

 
26Trucking costs

 
 Utilization
 27Products from project

 
 28Price for products

 
 29Date of Sale

 
 30Did biomass markets exist previous to project?
No
 
 31Type of utilization

 
 32How well did the woody biomass match the utilization options?

 
33Distance to utilization

 
 Treatment guidelines, targets, limitations
 34Diameter limit

 
 35Basal area reduction

 
 36Crown coverage

 
 37Fuel loading

 
 38Retention guidelines

 
 39Treatment of snags and downed logs

 
 40Soil impacts

 
41Other ecological impacts monitored

 
 Pre Treatment
 42Fuel load

 
 43Stem density (stems/ac)

 
 44Basal area (ft2/ac)

 
 45Canopy closure (%)

 
 46Height to live crown base

 
 47Snags and downed woody material

 
 48Size class distribution

 
 49Tree species composition

 
 50Presence/absence of invasive species

 
51Soil and other ecological data

 
 Post Treatment
 52Fuel load

 
 53Stem density (stems/ac)

 
 54Basal area (ft2/ac)

 
 55Canopy closure (%)

 
 56Height to live crown base

 
 57Snags and downed woody material

 
 58Size class distribution

 
 59Tree species composition

 
 60Presence/absence of invasive species

 
 61Soil and other ecological data

 

 
PDFPrintE-mail
 
< Prev   Next >